This section is a collection of worked examples in static equilibrium, situations in which a system is static (not moving), so that there is no acceleration and therefore no net forces in any direction.

Often in physics and engineering, mechanics is divided into static systems ("statics") and moving or dynamic systems ("dynamics").

I'll add more examples over time. (12/8/17)

The free-body diagram for this situation looks like this.

The gravitational force vector (**F _{g} = mg**) pulls the box toward the center of Earth. We break that force into components parallel to and perpendicular to the ramp – that coordinate system is much more convenient to the problem, and we call these

The force of gravity pulling the box *down* the ramp is:

and the force vector pulling it *into* the ramp is:

For a ramp of angle less than 45˚, we expect more force into the ramp than down it.

Now we require that for the box not to move, the force of friction (which always opposes the motion or proposed motion) must be at least equal to **F _{x}**:

Now the force of friction on the box is just the normal force, which mirrors **F _{y}** (Newton's third law), multiplied by the coefficient of friction, a unit-less quantity specific to the particular interface – in this case the interface between the surfaces of the block and ramp. We can rearrange to solve for

The

The picture is similar to the last example, but we don't need to know the mass of the object, and the angle will be a variable.

The free-body diagram looks like this. By the way, sometimes my students ask about why I sometimes draw two **F _{x}** vectors. Roll over/tap the image to see why.

In order for the mass to slide, we need the force of gravity down the ramp (the **x**-component of **F _{g}**) to be just greater than the force of friction, which always opposes the motion:

Now the force of friction is the normal force (the opposite of **F _{y}**) multiplied by the coefficient of friction,

Now if we use some trigonometry, we can express **F _{x}** and

Plugging those into the inequality gives:

Now we see that **F _{g}** (and consequently the mass of the object) doesn't matter:

Dividing both sides by **cos(θ)** gives

which gives us this very simple relation for the critical angle.

We could also write that as **θ > tan ^{-1}(μ)**. Here is a table of some critical angles as a function of mu.

*Note: We should note here that we're referring to the coefficient of static friction. (See friction).*

Here's a picture of the scenario. The vertical wire attached to the weight isn't necessary, but the tension in that segment must be 10 N.

We can break those tension vectors down into vertical and horizontal components. We'll label each component vector with its side (**1** or **2**) and with the appropriate coordinate (**x** for horizontal or **y** for vertical).

I've moved the angle labels according to the properties of parallel lines.

Now we know that our object is not moving, so it's not moving horizontally. Thus the net force in the horizontal direction must be zero, so we have two ways of looking at that:

Here's how we find the horizontal components of the tension:

Using our second relation above (**F _{1x} = - F_{2x}**), we have

Now because the system isn't accelerating up or down, either, we know that the sum of all upward forces has to equal the downward force:

Finding those vertical components of the tension looks like this:

Plugging those into our vertical-components relation above gives us our second foundation equation:

OK. Now we've got to find two tensions, and we've got two equations to do it. Let's take **(1)** and solve it for **T _{2}**:

Now we'll take that value of **T _{2}** and plug it into

We want to solve for **T _{1}**, which is in two terms, so we'll remove it as a factor:

All of the stuff in parentheses is a constant, so we'll just divide by it on both sides:

That gives

Now we can go back to our expression for **T _{2}** in terms of

Working out the arithmetic gives us both tensions:

Notice that (a) they're different, and (b) the wire with the larger angle (most straight) has the most tension. Also notice that the tension here is negative. That's a result of the fact that the component vectors are signed. We can regard the tension as positive in both wires because one isn't really pulling the the opposite direction as the other. We'll need the negative tension in what follows, though.

We should check these tensions and make sure that all of the forces are what we think they should be. The horizontal forces, **F _{1x}** and

... and they do. The vertical forces, **F _{1y}** and

... and they do, so this is a good solution.

Here is the drawing for this problem. The tension in either rope/wire should be the same.

The vector diagram looks like this.

The mass is not accelerating to the left or right, so the horizontal components of each tension vector must add to zero. The sum of the two vertical components must equal the downward force, **F _{g}**.

Some trigonometry gives us **F _{y}** in terms of the tension,

Now we can plug that version of **F _{y}** into the previous equality to get

Solving for the tension gives us:

Now let's analyze this solution. Notice that **F _{g}** and 2 are constants, so the variable expression is the

Here is a plot of the tension over angles from 90˚ (ropes hanging straight down and equally sharing half of **F _{g}**) and 0˚. Notice how rapidly the tension grows as the angle shrinks.

This is why we can never observe a wire stretched to a perfectly-horizontal line between two power poles.

This site is a one-person operation. If you can manage it, I'd appreciate anything you could give to help defray the cost of keeping up the domain name, server, search service and my time.

**xaktly.com** by Dr. Jeff Cruzan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. © 2016, Jeff Cruzan. All text and images on this website not specifically attributed to another source were created by me and I reserve all rights as to their use. Any opinions expressed on this website are entirely mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of my employers. Please feel free to send any questions or comments to jeff.cruzan@verizon.net.