The concept of potential energy (**PE**) can be a little difficult to wrap your mind around.

Kinetic energy (**KE**) is easier: Things that are moving obviously have energy. A baseball can knock you on the head (and hurt), a moving train could flatten you, and so on. But an object (stationary or moving) also has a kind of energy just by virtue of where it is *located* with respect to other objects in the universe, and that may seem a little weird (at first).

The first, most obvious example is that of **gravitational potential energy** energy.

A baseball on flat ground has nowhere to go, but a baseball lifted in the air or located on a hill has the **potential** to fall or roll — to move under the influence of gravity. That movement is an expression of KE that used to be stored as PE.

Forces are the *reality* that create the *concept* of potential energy. Without forces, there would be no potential energy. The examples below illustrate the concept of the** force field**, a sort of map of how invisible forces between objects change as their relative position changes. The force field, forces and the potential energy are related.

Gravity is a force that we can model mathematically very well using the universal law of gravitation,

where **G** is the gravitational constant (**G** = 6.67 × 10^{-11} m^{3}K^{-1}s^{-2}), m_{1} and m_{2} are the masses of two objects, and r is the distance between them in meters. Any object with mass exerts a gravitational force on any other object with mass. Planets and stars, of course, are very massive, thus they exert the largest forces.

The gravitational force produced by any thing on another thing is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between (see box below). That means that if I double my distance from the center of Earth, the gravitational attraction that Earth and I exert on each other is reduced to ¼ its original value.

In the diagram, the circles represent spheres of constant force. The closer the spacing between circles, the greater the force. In this way, the potential energy has the look of a topographic map: the closer the curves, the steeper the slope of the hill.

According to universal law of gravity, the gravitational force between to objects is

where **G** is the gravitational constant, **m _{1}** and

This image is a representation of the gravitational potential energy around a planet. The planet would lie at the center of the "well".

At far distances where the gravitational force is weak, the potential well is not steep, and the force is small. Near the planet the surface becomes much steeper. The force felt by an object attracted to the planet is proportional to the steepness of this potential. In fact, force is precisely the slope of this 3-D curve in a given direction.

If the graph represents the potential energy function, then its steepness (its derivative in calculus) at any point is the gravitational force at that point.

Albert Einstein showed that space (or "space-time") can actually be viewed as a 2-dimensional surface like this, and that the masses of the planets and stars warp that surface as shown in the figure. Objects then "fall" into that potential energy "well."

The **pendulum** is a great example of how gravitational potential energy works. Here we can toss aside the warping of space-time and just think of gravity as an invisible downward force.

The pendulum works solely because of the force of gravity.

When the weight of the pendulum is raised, we do work to give it potential energy that is proportional to the height. At the endpoints of the arc of the pendulum weight, there is a moment as it changes direction when its velocity is zero, so it has no kinetic energy at all. At those points, *all* of its energy is potential energy.

At the bottom of the swing, when the weight points toward the center of Earth, it has no potential energy relative to where it started. It is, however, moving as fast as it will ever move, all of its PE having been converted to KE.

Then the process begins all over again, as the weight rises, it loses speed (and thus KE), and gains gravitational PE. The only thing that slows the whole thing down is a little bit of friction with air molecules that eventually will cause the pendulum to stop.

Potential energy is a storage mode for kinetic energy. As a pendulum moves from side to side, all of its KE is converted to PE momentarily, only to be converted back to KE, and so on.

Many devices can store **elastic** potential energy and release it as kinetic energy: a spring, a rubber band, an archer's bow, a catapult ...

The animation on the right shows a compressed spring at rest. In its compressed state, the spring stores elastic potential energy. The downward force it exerts on the hanging mass is proportional to the amount of compression (see Hooke's law).

Once the mass reaches the middle of its travel, and is at its equilibrium (unstretched / uncom-pressed) length, it will then begin to be stretched, storing more potential energy in that way. The force exerted on the hanging mass is greatest at either end, less in the middle, thus the mass has its greatest elastic potential energy when the spring is most compressed or most stretched.

Of course, it's also possible to over-stretch a spring, ruining its energy storage properties. My students do that with Slinkies™. I don't know why.

The potential energy of a spring is given by

**PE = ½kx ^{2}**

where k is a constant that depends on the propoerties of the particular sping and x is its stretched or compressed length from its equilibrium length.

Charged objects, like **electrons** (-) and **protons** (+) exert invisible forces on one-another. These are called **electrostatic forces**. Like gravity, these are non-contact forces (one object doesn't have to touch another in order to exert a force on it). But unlike gravity, electrostatic forces can be **attractive** *or* **repulsive**. (Gravity is always attractive — no one ever just gets ejected off the planet while walking down the street.)

Here is a sketch of oppositely-charged particles in close approach. The circles represent "lines of force." Just like in our gravity example above, the closer together the lines of force, the more force exerted on and by the particles. This is always the case with oppositely-charged particles: The electrostatic force causes oppositely-charged particles to attract.

If we looked at these lines of force in three dimensions (think of them again as a topographic map), the red circles might extend above the page, and the blue ones below — the difference between positive and negative forces. The lines of force for like-charged particles, such as two electrons or two protons, looks like this.

These particles repel one another. In 3-D, these lines of force would both form mountains below the plane of the page.

The force between two charged particles is given by **Coulomb's law**:

where * k* is a constant called the Coulomb constant (

Remember that with an inverse-square law, the force drops off with the square of the increased distance. For example, if the distance is doubled, the force falls to ¼ of its previous value.

Gravitational potential energy (**PE**) is easy to calculate, and we can use it to get an idea of the usefulness of **PE**.

It turns out that the potential energy gained by raising a mass, **m**, to a height h is exactly equal to the amount of work needed to lift it there, which is the force (**mg**, where **g = 9.8 m·s ^{-2}**, is the acceleration of gravity) multiplied by the distance moved (

**PE = mgh**

The SI units of potential energy are then ^{2}·s^{-2}

X
### SI units

SI stands for Système international (of units). In 1960, the SI system of units was published as a guide to the preferred units to use for a variety of quantities. Here are some common SI units

length | meter | (m) |

mass | Kilogram | (Kg) |

time | second | (s) |

force | Newton | N |

energy | Joule | J |

**xaktly.com** by Dr. Jeff Cruzan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. © 2012-2014, Jeff Cruzan. All text and images on this website not specifically attributed to another source were created by me and I reserve all rights as to their use. Any opinions expressed on this website are entirely mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of my employers. Please feel free to send any questions or comments to jeff.cruzan@verizon.net.