This special section on the ideal gas law follows from the section on gas laws. You might want to begin there for a better understanding of where the ideal gas law originates. You might also benefit from reading about the kinetic molecular theory of gases.
The ideal gas law has been developed from both an empirical approach and by building up a picture of gas particles from first principles in physics – the statistical mechanics approach.
It is extremely useful, but it does have limitations, which we'll discuss at the end of this section. Gases aren't ideal, but many are ideal enough under the right conditions that the ideal gas law gives us the right results.
In developing the ideal gas law, we make the following assumptions that you should bear in mind while using it:
An empirical rule or law is one that is based on experiment and observation instead of pure mathematical logic. Empirical observations inform theoretical investigations, and theory invites experiment in order to confirm, disprove or improve the theory.
In the field of statistical mechanics ("stat-mech"), we begin by considering the physics of small particles and their interactions, and then expand that behavior over large ensembles (groups) of particles using ideas from probability and statistics.
The ideal gas law takes two forms, an atomic/molecular form (top), and a molar form (bottom).
N is the number of particles (atoms or molecules) and k = 1.381 × 10^{-23} J/K is the Boltzmann constant.
n is the number of moles of a gas and R = 8.314 J/mol·K is the molar gas constant in SI units.
SI stands for Le Système International d'Unités (French), or International System of Units.
It is a standardized system of physical units based on the meter (m), kilogram (Kg), second (s), ampere (A), Kelvin (K), candela (cd), and mole (mol), along with a set of prefixes to indicate multiplication or division by a power of ten.
When using the molar gas law, PV = nRT, you have some choices of units. The SI unit of volume is the cubic meter (m^{3}), but that unit can be cumbersome, and the use of liters as a unit of gas volume is often favored. Likewise, the SI unit of pressure is the Pascal (Pa), but the atmosphere (1 atm = 101,325 Pa) is used more frequently in some fields
You can adapt to the set of units you'd like to use just by changing the gas constant. Here are the constants and the units of pressure, temperature and volume that go with them. While, when using gas laws like Charles' law and the Gay-Lussac law, it's OK to use Celsius temperatures (because they appear in ratios where the units cancel), it's important to use Kelvin temperatures in the ideal gas law.
R = 8.314 J·mol^{-1}K^{-1}
P in Pascals (Pa)
V in cubic meters (m^{3})
T in Kelvin
R = 0.0821 liter·atm·mol^{-1}K^{-1}
P in atmospheres (atm)
V in liters (L)
T in Kelvin
Solution: Our units are mostly SI, so we should use the gas constant R = 8.314 J·mol^{-1}K^{-1}, and convert the temperature to Kelvin: T = (273 + 25) = 298 K.
Now we rearrange the ideal gas law to solve for the number of moles. Do the rearrangement first so that we can plug numbers and units into the result an know we're on the right track:
The result is:
Hopefully, you're wondering about how those units magically worked out to give us moles. Here is that equation (PV/RT) again, but this time just with units. Pascals have been expanded to their base SI units, 1Pa = 1 Kg·m^{-1}·s^{-2}, and Joules likewise, 1 J = 1 Kg·m^{2}·s^{-2}.
Like units have been canceled with a different color: Kg in red, meters in blue, and so on. See if you can follow the cancellations. We end up with 1/(1/moles), which is moles. Tada!
Solution: We want temperature, so we need to first rearrange the ideal gas law to solve for temperature:
Now our units of pressure and volume are atmospheres and liters, so using R = 0.0821 liter·atm·mol^{-1}K^{-1}is the best way to go.
Plugging the numbers in, we get:
See if you can follow the unit cancellation. Units will always tell you if you're on the right (or wrong) track. So the temperature is:
We converted to Celsius by subtracting 0˚C = 273K.
Solution: For part (a), we'll rearrange PV = nRT to find the number of moles:
Plugging in the information,
gives
Now for part (b) we want the volume from PV = nRT:
Plugging in the new pressure and the rest of the information gives us:
So the bottle loses almost half of its volume in descending to sea level from 14,000 ft.
There is another way of getting to this result, and it's somewhat simpler. Consider that the PV product for each state (high and low altitude) are given by these ideal-gas equations:
Because nRT is the same for both, we can use the transitive property to equate the PV products
... which is really just Boyle's law. It can be rearranged to find the final volume like this:
Then we see that the final volume is just the ratio of the pressures multiplied by the initial volume
... which gives the same result.
In chemistry, we abbreviate a common set of conditions "STP," which stands for "standard temperature and pressure."
At STP, T = 273.15 K (0˚C) and P = 1 atm = 101,325 Pa = 101.325 KPa.
You should memorize the meaning of STP; it's used very frequently.
Solution:
As usual, we'll rearrange the ideal gas law to solve for volume:
Plugging in n = 1 mole, T = 273.15 K and P = 1 atm (and the appropriate gas constant, R = 0.0821 L·atm/mol·K), we get
The result is an important number, called the molar gas volume. One mole of any well-behaved (ideal) gas occupies this volume at STP:
The volume of 1 mole of any gas at STP is 22.4 liters. This volume can vary if the gas or the conditions lead to non-ideal behavior.
Two gas cylinders are connected by a valve, as shown. The volume of cylinder 1 is 24 L, and the volume of cylinder 2 is 18 L. If cylinder A contains 1.1 moles of gas at T = 300K and the valve is opened: (a) Calculate the pressure of the two cylinders together after their temperature is stabilized at 300K, and (b) What will happen if valve B is opened?
Sometimes our assumptions of ideality break down and we have to consider the effects of those non-idealities on our calculations using the ideal gas law. A good place to start thinking about them is with the assumptions we made in the first place.
The first was that gases are spherical, basically have no size, and that the distance between them is much larger than the particle size. We know that this is not strictly true. some gases like CO_{2}, water (H_{2}O) and methane (CH_{4}) are linear or bent or three-dimensional.
And for some gases, the attraction between "particles" is actually quite large, particularly at high pressure when the distance between them is significantly reduced. CO_{2}, for example, actually liquefies at room temperature and pressures above about 100 atm – definitely not ideal gas behavior.
The second and third assumptions (see list at the top of this page) don't usually cause too much of a problem, but the fourth, that collisions with the walls of the container are perfectly-elastic, can be a problem. Sometimes gas atoms or molecules can be attracted to the walls of the container, causing energy (but not momentum) to be lost in collisions.
Finally, the sixth assumption, that collisions with the container walls are more frequent than collisions with other atoms or molecules, begins to break down when particles are large or pressures are high.
The essential root of all of the possible breakdowns of our ideal gas assumptions is that molecules actually do have size and they can exert attractive forces on each other and the walls of their container.
There are other models and patches to the ideal gas law that we can use when the ideal approximation breaks down. Those are discussed in another section.
This site is a one-person operation. If you can manage it, I'd appreciate anything you could give to help defray the cost of keeping up the domain name, server, search service and my time.
xaktly.com by Dr. Jeff Cruzan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. © 2016, Jeff Cruzan. All text and images on this website not specifically attributed to another source were created by me and I reserve all rights as to their use. Any opinions expressed on this website are entirely mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of my employers. Please feel free to send any questions or comments to jeff.cruzan@verizon.net.